Tuesday, October 13, 2009

From: Nate Meneer [mailto:nmeneer@bu.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:13 AM
To: Bellott, Sarah D; 'David Kjar'
Subject: RE: Revision

Sorry, I must have miscommunicated on this point. I want to look at 1766-1770. These boundaries work well.

Nate

From: Bellott, Sarah D [mailto:sdinsmor@bu.edu]
Sent: October-13-09 10:53 A
To: Meneer, Nathanael, Raymond; David Kjar
Subject: RE: Revision

Hi all,

I think that 1766 to 1770 seems like a manageable chunk. Nate – did you prefer 1776-1775? Wasn’t sure which you meant. A decade is possibly a large amount of time to generalize about in our conclusions.

Best,
Sarah

No comments:

Post a Comment